Research and education

Evidence Should Clarify the Decision

We translate independent research, tax rules, and planning methods into plain English—while keeping assumptions and limitations visible.

A business owner discussing retirement research with an advisor

DESIGN • TEST • COORDINATE

EY 2025 modeled findings

What integration changed under the study’s assumptions

EY modeled investment-only plans against plans that integrated investments and insurance products. The results below are plan-level outputs, not product returns.

EY modeled retirement income comparison
HouseholdInvestment only30% FIA plus investmentsModeled difference
Age 35 couple$128,430$157,76422.8%
Age 45 couple$94,687$110,02016.2%
Age 65 couple with Social Security$68,779$72,0794.8%

At equal modeled income—age 45

Probability of success: 90.0% → 94.9%. Median legacy: $5.125M → $6.347M.

At equal modeled income—age 65

Probability of success: 90.0% → 95.5%. Median legacy: $832,000 → $1.045M.

Source: Ernst & Young, “Holistic Planning: Integrating Insurance Products for Better Outcomes in Retirement,” 2025. These are model results under EY’s assumptions, not FIA returns, projections, guarantees, or an endorsement. BlackRock findings are discussed only with their combined delayed Social Security and allocation assumptions.

Research library

Continue with focused educational tools

Sequence Risk

Why the first five years matter

Explore →

Roth Conversion Roadmap

How multi-year decisions are compared

Explore →

Retirement Calculators

Explore educational illustrations

Explore →